Is Jesus a myth? No. But that certainly doesn’t deter some people from claiming that he is. Thankfully, many theologians and apologists have responded to this assertion well. We’ve rounded up some great responses and videos that throttle and trash the claim that Jesus is not what Christians believe him to be.
There’s something that has been weighing on me, as I’m sure it has weighed on some of you. If it hasn’t, please bear with me and try to see where I’m coming from.
Young Earth Creationism and Old Earth Creationism.
There. I’ve said the terms in the same sentence and already many of you are probably getting nervous, or upset, or disappointed, or whatever. But like I said, please bear with me. Up front I’d like to say that I’m not advocating for either position in this article, per say, but rather advocating for respectful, honest dialogue, and grace. Naturally, I have an opinion, but that’s not the point of this article, and it’s not something that we want to take a hard line on at Youth Apologetics Network. We see great value in non-inflammatory conversations that avoid using straw man and ad hominem and all of the other unreasonable tactics that are too often used during these age of the earth conversations (so much so that we made a book for families).
This isn’t an article about who is right and who is wrong; it’s about how we interact with each other. It’s about how we raise up the next generation of children to interact with each other.
It’s easy to stay in your bubble. It’s cozy and familiar. Even on the occasion when one belief is causing friction with another, as long as no outside source shines light on the cognitive dissonance, we can keep on keeping on.
But that’s not what we’re called to do. And it’s not really what we’re content with, is it?
This week marked the beginning of a new year of Sunday School classes at our church. Each year provides a fresh opportunity to help young minds think well and further their relationship with and understanding of God. I like to ask the incoming first graders for their biggest, hardest question about God. That gives us the whole year to make sure they hear the answer.
After recovering from the question of one child who asked “How do mommies and daddies make babies?” (“for the love of everything, child, ask your parents!!”), one boy volunteered that he has “at least 500 questions” but “can God make a rock so big he can’t pick it up?”
This week, my Jehovah’s Witness friends are stopping by for a visit. It will be the first time my boys can understand the conversation, so I’ve started thinking of terms that should be clarified with them before the meeting (just in case). “Begotten” and “created” come to mind.
When these Witnesses and I met to study “What Does the Bible Really Teach?” together, we had some very tough conversations, and though the meetings ended after a year and a few difficult questions, we were able to end on friendly terms and they still stop by from time to time.
One topic of conversation that we come back to time and time again was the matter of whether Jesus is God or a created being. Was he begotten or created? The Bible tells us:
For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish, but have eternal life.
-John 3:16 NASB
that God has fulfilled this promise to our children in that He raised up Jesus, as it is also written in the second Psalm, ‘You are My Son; today i have begotten You.’
-Acts 13:33 NASB
The word we see is “begotten.” Helping our children avoid the confusion that binds Watchtower adherents is important to me. If Jesus is anything less than fully God, we are all in a lot of trouble. So what is the difference between begotten and created?
Beget= be father of/to
Create= to make
Human men beget baby humans, swallows beget baby swallows in eggs, and cats beget kittens. One thing begets a thing that is the same kind of thing as itself. They are equal things. Though a baby is smaller than a man, it is no less human than the man. Same with cats and swallows and all other living things.
Now what of creating?
A swallow creates a nest of mud. Has the swallow made something that is the same kind of thing as itself? Nope! A cat makes something in the litter box -I don’t need to be more descriptive than that, do I?- and it is definitely not another cat! Would you ever say that a nest or litter box leaving is equal to the creature that made it? How about a man? What does he make? In The Joyful Christian, C.S. Lewis writes:
“A man makes […] a statue. If he is a clever enough carver, he may make a statue which is very like a man indeed. But, of course, it is not a real man; it only looks like one. It cannot breathe or think. It is not alive.”(p.39)
Lewis then continues to clarify the differences between begetting and creating:
“Now that is the first thing to get clear. What God begets is God; just as what man begets is man. What God creates is not God; just as what man makes is not man. That is why men are not Sons of God in the sense that Christ is. They may be like God in certain ways, but they are not things of the same kind. They are more like statues or pictures of God.”(p.40)
It is easy to see how the misunderstanding can come about when we don’t understand the difference between begetting and creating. If we assume they are the same thing, or use the words interchangeably, we miss the important difference that a begotten thing is the same kind of thing as the thing that begot it, and a created thing is a different thing than the thing that created it. However, we can also deduce, even without the understanding of the two words we are discussing, that God did not “create” another God or god, nor could he have “begotten” one in the exact sense that man “begets” man. Consider these verses (emphasis mine):
“You are my witnesses,” declares the Lord,
“and my servant whom I have chosen,
that you may know and believe me
and understand that I am he.
Before me no god was formed,
nor shall there be any after me.
-Isaiah 43:10 ESV
Remember the former things of old;
for I am God, and there is no other;
I am God, and there is none like me,
-Isaiah 46:9 ESV
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
-John 1:1 ESV (in the NLT it says “the word was A god”)
Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I am.” So they picked up stones to throw at him, but Jesus hid himself and went out of the temple.
-John 8:58-59 ESV
When I [John] saw him, I fell at his feet as though dead. But he laid his right hand on me, saying, “Fear not, I am the first and the last, and the living one. I died, and behold I am alive forevermore, and I have the keys of Death and Hades.
-Revelation 1:17 ESV
Jesus said “I AM” and the Jews prepared to stone him for blasphemy. He calls himself “the first and the last.” If there are no other Gods before or after God, and God will not give his glory to another, and Jesus claims to be God and God is still pleased with him, we can reasonably believe that Jesus must be the same God. If Jesus were a created God (or a God begotten in the way that men beget), then all of the verses above are contradictory and confusing and suggest that God doesn’t know what he is talking about. Or he is a liar. That is not the God we worship or that JWs worship. So, perhaps our understanding of the way “begotten” is used in the Bible needs to be refined a bit further. Let’s take a look at what the actual greek word we are translating as “begotten” – monogenes – means:
According to the Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature (BAGD, 3rd Edition), monogenes has two primary definitions. The first definition is “pertaining to being the only one of its kind within a specific relationship.” This is its meaning in Hebrews 11:17when the writer refers to Isaac as Abraham’s “only begotten son” (KJV). Abraham had more than one son, but Isaac was the only son he had by Sarah and the only son of the covenant. Therefore, it is the uniqueness of Isaac among the other sons that allows for the use of monogenes in that context.
The second definition is “pertaining to being the only one of its kind or class, unique in kind.” This is the meaning that is implied in John 3:16 (see also John 1:14, 18; 3:18; 1 John 4:9). John was primarily concerned with demonstrating that Jesus is the Son of God (John 20:31), and he uses monogenes to highlight Jesus as uniquely God’s Son—sharing the same divine nature as God—as opposed to believers who are God’s sons and daughters by adoption (Ephesians 1:5). Jesus is God’s “one and only” Son.
The bottom line is that terms such as “Father” and “Son,” descriptive of God and Jesus, are human terms that help us understand the relationship between the different Persons of the Trinity. If you can understand the relationship between a human father and a human son, then you can understand, in part, the relationship between the First and Second Persons of the Trinity. The analogy breaks down if you try to take it too far and teach […] that Jesus was literally “begotten” as in “produced” or “created” by God the Father.
I plan to be more precise when we discuss procreation with our children (even that adds confusion to the mix, doesn’t it? Shouldn’t it be pro-begetting?!). Instead of saying parents make babies, they beget. This distinction will lay groundwork for helping our children understand that nature of Jesus. Though Jesus could not have been “begotten” in the exact way that a man begets a man, we see that the New Testament writers wanted to convey something very important about who Jesus is, namely that he is the same kind of uncreated thing as God… and unique.
This post was edited for clarity on August 4, 2015. Thank you for your input!
Recently, I was playing the game Operation with one of my children. If you’ve never
endured enjoyed this pastime, let me break it down for you. Players take turns using tweezers to pull out various afflictions, ranging from a bird in the brain to a frog in the throat, from your patient “Cavity Sam.” But, if you’re not careful, the tweezers will hit the side of the opening, causing a loud buzzer to sound and red light to flash. Cavity Sam is riddled with ailments and he needs some desperate treatment. Enter heresy.
You’ve probably heard this before:
“People who are basically good and do their best will go to Heaven. I’m nice and I do more good things than bad things, so I’m going, too.”
Now, before we dive into the reasons that this thinking is flawed and dangerous, let’s first see what the Bible says about who gets to go to Heaven. Christianity’s teaching on this matter is unique, because other religions would largely agree that good works are the basis for a pleasant afterlife (We will address the false belief that “all religions are basically alike” in a future post).
This short, informative video, created by Nathan Hoffman, addresses a commonly raised objection about the accuracy of the Bible: unicorns!
We were fortunate enough to see this video shared on Facebook, and hope that it proves to be an interesting watch for you as well. Why does the Bible mention unicorns? Aren’t those things mythical? What is going on?? Watch with your kiddos, or explain what you learn to them as you read the verses provided in the video and in the article we’ve linked to below.
You can follow the link to the original article on Creationtoday.org. Enjoy!